Proposals
Truth About Social Security ("TASS") Plan
Plan Options
The plan offers two distinct programs, at the election of the employee
-- the traditional "defined benefits" plan and a new "defined
contributions" alternative.
Traditional (defined benefit) plan
This plan operates similarly to the current social security plan, with
benefits based on adjusted salaries and length of employment. Because
employees may elect to shift between plans, the number of years to qualify
for defined benefits is the number of years of contributions to either
plan, but the actual benefit is determined solely by the years the employee
has contributed to the defined plan.
For example, if the individual has been employed for 35 years (more than
enough to qualify for benefits and the "standard" used in calculating
the benefit) but has elected the defined contribution plan for only 8
of those years, the guaranteed benefit would be based on 8/35 of the of
benefit payable on the average (adjusted) salary.
Assets held for payment of defined contribution benefits would be invested
in a mix of corporate stocks, commercial debt and government bonds consistent
with prudent long term growth of assets over the infinite horizon. Because
of the dollar size of the reserves, the reserve account would be able
to cushion shifts in market conditions without transferring market risk
to the beneficiaries.
New (Defined Contribution) Plan
The new plan will operate much as envisioned by the President's Commission.
The employee may elect to divert part or all of his share of the payroll
tax collected to an individual account. While this election is made prior
to the start of the year, actual distribution of funds will not occur
until 3-6 months following the close of the year, since individual income
data is not received from employers until the close of the year. It would
make sense, therefore, that funds that are to be invested in individual
accounts be credited along with at least some of the interest earned during
the interval (during which time the money has been invested in the same
manner as the funds earmarked for the traditional plan).
The government would operate three or more pools of funds, using various
mixes of stock, investment grade corporate debt and government debt into
which individuals direct their individual account contributions, based
on the individual's propensity for/aversion to risk. The pools would be
based on an index of funds selected by criteria, not name. The indices
would be broad enough so that the combination of government pools held
a relatively small percentage (5% or less) of each company's publicly
held stock. All investment selections would be mechanistic and distributed
over the range of companies, with annual adjustments, where necessary,
to restore the portfolio to the stated mixtures of investments. These
are the Tier I funds referred to by the Presidential Commission.
Periodic transfers from these funds to privately managed, but federally
certified funds would be permitted.
Employee Selection
Employee selection for future contributions (distribution among plans
and, if defined contribution plan, which pool) would be submitted at least
three months prior to the start of a calendar year for which the determination
is made. The determination would remain in effect for subsequent years,
until changed. While it might be allowable for the individual to shift
existing assets among the pools in the defined contribution plan, no transfer
of accumulated assets (benefits) between the two primary plans would be
allowed.
Transfer to outside funds
Periodically, an employee might elect to transfer funds from the SSA-administered
defined contribution pools to pools managed by outside organizations.
Such pools could provide a wider array of investment opportunities but
such transfers would be made only to federally certified organizations
and pools established to meet conservative investment goals consistent
with long term growth of assets. To further reduce risks of underfunding
retirement needs and insuring against short term market fluctuations just
prior to retirement, certain pools might considered unsuitable for inclusion
during the ten years before normal retirement, requiring a shift in funds
during that period.
Maximum chargeable fees and costs (as a percentage of managed assets)
would be established and certified funds would be required to be insured
against all risks not related to market fluctuations. Any increases in
fees (within the maximum established) would require sufficient advance
notice to allow individuals to transfer assets without penalties or administrative
costs.
Next: Benefit payouts
 |